A recent BBC investigation has been described by a leading officer as 'shocking' as it uncovers more than 150 reports of camera misuse by forces across England and Wales.
This is unfortunately something that occurs in a number of our cases - where clients have claimed that the police were not recording all the footage. This is probably in an attempt to conceal parts of the arrest which could be considered unreasonable i.e. where force or even just bad language is used in a manner which is not required or justified. (Police are allowed to use force if they can prove that it was lawful, proportionate and necessary in the circumstances).
Body-worn cameras were introduced with the intention of protecting both the police and the victims. The idea being that it would protect the police against malicious complaints and improve the quality of evidence collected as a whole. However, during a two-year investigation, the BBC have obtained reports that these cameras have been misused and the police have not always been transparent or used them in the way in which they were intended. Such findings include:
- Sharing camera footage with colleagues or friends - either in person, via WhatsApp or on social media
- Images of a naked person being shared between officers on email and cameras used to covertly record conversations
- Footage being lost, deleted or not marked as evidence, including video, filmed by Bedfordshire Police, of a vulnerable woman alleging she had been raped by an inspector - the force later blamed an "administrative error"
- Switching off cameras during incidents, for which some officers faced no sanctions - one force said an officer may have been "confused"
Police forces' attitudes towards cameras are wrong....There are too many dark things that go on that we are not seeing